REDFIELD — The Redfield City Council voted unanimously Jan. 15 to amend the 2012 municipal budget and adopted the 2013 city departmental budgets, the latter including 3 percent raises for most city employees, according to Mayor Tony Lawhon.
Redfield adopts 2013 budget
City councils frequently amend budget to correlate revenues and expenditures at the end of a calendar year.
In other action during the council meeting, Lawhon said the state Division of Legislative Audits gave the city “a clean bill of health” except in two areas.
The auditors noted municipal checks written in 2011 and 2010 totaling $11,978 and $10,054, respectively, lacked supporting documentation and no W-2 or Form 1099 were issued.
Lawhon said the city has amended its financial policies and will no longer do business with the vendor involved. He said the city has also tightened up on petty cash controls as a result of a second point raised by auditors.
The January session was the first council meeting for four of the six aldermen, who were sworn in on Jan. 1 by District Court Judge Kim Bridgforth. The four freshmen aldermen are Glen Flemmons, Ward 1, Position 1; Carol Eagle, Ward 1, Position 2; Larry O’Briant, Ward 2, Position 2; and Diann Smith, Ward 3, Position 1.
Incumbent Sandra G. Garrett holds the Ward 2, Position 1, council seat, while Darrell Hedden retained his Ward 3, Position 2, in the November general election.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Stephens Media LLC or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Stephens Media LLC is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.
